Monday, 5 April 2010

Oh my goth-Gena Showalter

As a bit of a goth connoisseur myself, I had high expectations for this book.Expectations that landed FLAT.

The book is weaved around a conflict between the goth group and the prep group;put some narrow-mindedness in the mix, and you've got the classic cliche of 'They're torturing me because I'm goth' .First of all, if you respect others, they'll respect you.Not in the same amount, maybe, but still, atleast a bit, but if you go around insulting teachers and generally yabbering around you'll get your butt put back where it belongs, nevermind goth, prep, nerd, jock or idiot-status.

Second of all, although the little groups rub against each other frequently, and sometimes not in the friendly way, such a harsh split is phantasmagoric, and this is coming from someone that lived 8 years straight in a class with nearly no like-minded people. Go figure

I must admit, I liked the whole inverted-scenario as a means of making the two opposite parties accept each other-and it makes a point indeed.

But overall, for its unrealistic depiction of the Goth scene, I can't give this book more than 3/5.

Endings...Catch-22 by Joseph Heller

Catch-22 is a fictive military pun, according to which if an individual willingly flies life-threatening missions he is insane and therefore not apt to fly them;but if the individual makes the necesary arangements as to be relieved of duty, he proves he is sane and therefore illegible to be relieved from duty. Fun, huh? 

Another medal goes for the main character:Yossarian.An adorable son-of-a-b***h that will do anything to live.A bit of a soldier Dr. House, if you will.

The only thing I can deem as a defect fo this book is that it's HUGE. But...that's also a silver lining, I feel like I'm burying Yossarian right now.and it's sad...

the "endings' part of the post's title has nothing to do with any official alternate title to Catch-22. It's just the bitter-sweet expression of finishing a great book AND the second box of sweet cherry tea.On the same day.

Monday, 8 March 2010

At The Mountains Of Madness

"At The Mountains Of Madness"

It's been quite a while since I last wrote a review on this site. School work and such have been keeping me busy, and I haven't read too many books lately that I'm actually interested. So, without further ado, I will announce the novel I shall review from my past which you already guessed thanks to the title, At The Mountains Of Madness by H.P. Lovecraft, written in 1931. Let us begin.

The book stars Geologist William Dyer, who is stationed at the Antartica with a team of scholars. They find ruins beyond a dangerous path beyond a huge mountain range. The ruins are very odd. Dyer and some of the other members of the team on the excavation find 14 life forms that they are unable to identify. The life forms are preserved in ice, presumably dead, with 6 of them badly damaged, yet in very good condition. The whole place seems other wordly, because of apparent age of the ruins is far too great for any civilization to have build it, so Dyer and the others presume it to be a extra-terrestrial place. They come to the conclusion that the ruins havent evolved naturally and the highly evolved things they see there are unexplainable. When they finally return to their camp after being unable to contact it, they find everyone dead, except one dog and one team member.

The book has a terrific atmosphere, filling the reader with dread and terror as Dyer delves deeper in to this mystery. The character development of Dyer is an interesting one and his struggles with the things he sees, an interesting one. Dyer writes a diary in the story, which you yourself read as he writes it. The mythos is very defined, interesting and highly original, which keeps the reader interested while Dyer analyzes the ruins deeper and encounters the creatures dwell within. The writing style is very interesting, as the writing style increases the amount of feelings conveyed by the text over the book, all that dread, that fear, that hopelesness, perfectly transferred to the reader. All of the characters are well detailed, all with their own personal character traits, flaws and interests that are all well developed and explained during the book.

I'm not making this one too long since I could go on for hours, so I'll just wrap this up. The book is extremely fun to read, it's not too long and the language isn't too difficult, so it shouldn't pose any problem to read. Even though, it was written in 1931, it's still better than most sci-fi even in these days. May not be the most popular book ever, but it's still one of the best, which shows that not everything popular is always good (this logic works on 90% of all top 10 books read list).

That is all.... Good evening, and, stay away from weird ruins and this spot = 47° 9′ 0″ S, 126° 43′ 0″ W. The trip might end up badly for you.

Saturday, 30 January 2010

George Orwell-1984

Orwell was one of those authors I was afraid to read.what if I don't get it? what if I spoil it?Then, one cloudy day, I took the book from the library and started munching on it. I couldn't help but study it, write down not only the funny quotes, but the deep quotes, or the descriptive quotes.

Now, let's detail the plot a bit. It all happens in a dystopic landscape, a communism that exceeds any boundary.It's here that Winston tries to break free, and try to find out what freedom tastes like.But The Party can't let him shatter reality as it is known.

Your opinion on the books can be classified as ante-1984 or post-1984.I can't recommend this enough

6/5!